Who we work with.
Navtrix brings together studios, toolmakers, and publishing professionals who take mobile social casino development seriously. These are working relationships built on shared knowledge, not sponsorship deals or logo exchanges.
Get in touch
How partnerships work here
Our partner relationships are practical by design. We work with organisations that contribute directly to what participants learn — whether that means providing access to production tooling, sharing real pipeline data, or joining as guest instructors on specific topics. The label contributor: is more accurate than partner in most cases.
Partnerships are reviewed periodically. If a collaboration stops being useful for people learning in the programme, it ends. If you represent a studio or technology provider with genuine expertise in social casino production, we are open to a conversation — reach out via the contact page with a brief description of what you do.
Partners contribute to Navtrix programmes in specific, defined ways. Some share internal documentation on production toolchains. Others participate in recorded Q&A sessions where participants can ask direct questions about real projects. A smaller number offer limited access to their studios or staging environments, which gives learners a sense of how teams actually organise their work rather than how textbooks describe it. Each contribution is scoped and agreed in advance — there is no expectation that partners will promote the programme or appear in marketing material.
Navtrix does not list partners for appearance. Every organisation in the network has either contributed material, participated in a session, or provided access that was used in the actual curriculum. The selection process is informal but consistent: we look at whether a partner's work is directly relevant to social casino development at a professional level, whether they are willing to share practical detail rather than surface-level commentary, and whether the relationship adds something that participants could not get from publicly available resources alone. Several organisations approached us over the years; most were declined not because of quality issues but because the fit was too general.